Bright shiny new Website Update

Yeah, boring stuff, sort of.

Actually, not so much.  First off, I found a new background for my “Villanelle” poem that I’m really happy with.  My friend Caroline Cicero, who lives out in Malibu, caught a beautiful sunrise coming up over the Santa Monica mountains, and she gave me permission to use it with the poem.  I finally made time to but the image and words together and get it on a webpage for uploading.  So, this is the unveiling of the updated version. I’m so pleased with it because Caroline’s photo capture more the imagery I wanted that the previous version did (which had actually used a sunset picture).

Throughout the website, the basic header for the site has been updated, along with the navigation buttons being replaced by basic text links. The copyright information has been updated as well.

Now that the structure overhaul is completed, I can get back to adding material more regularly. I hope to add more poetry soon, as well as a new featured article (a Charles Williams paper I gave at Mythcon some time ago). Down the road, I plan on writing some articles specifically for the website.

Additionally, as I mentioned before, I’ll be adding my Zazzle store to the Gallery. I’ve been coloring some of my old Mythlore artwork for the fun of it, and intend to offer many of the pieces on blank notecards (at the very least). If you’d like to see the art on other items as well, do let me know!  You can see some of the things I’ve done so far over on my LiveJournal.

UPDATE TO EVENTS MENTION – in the previous post, I mentioned the GLAWS event next month, featureing Harry Turtledove and Tim Powers. Unfortunately, Tim has had to bow out of the February Special Speaker Event. In his place, author Barbara Hambly will be joining Harry to talk about researching for your novel. As a former Jeopardy! researcher, I get to moderate and toss in my two cents worth of advice as well. It should be a fun afternoon for writers, and I hope you consider coming.

Posted in Events, Website Updates | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Scribbler’s Guide News and Upcoming Events

Over on the Scribbler’s Guide site, I posted the blurb that author Tim Powers gave me for the book.  I’m using that to start a new push on the book.  I’ll shortly be announcing a contest on that site, one that I hope will be a lot of fun.

This coming Saturday, GLAWS will be having a speaker on how to improve your manuscript for publication.  And next month, Tim Powers and Harry Turtledove will be giving a panel on researching for your writing.  Great things that any writer should check out.

I’ve been doing some coloring of artwork that I did for Mythlore back in the day.  Over on LiveJournal, I posted a full page piece of one of the first ones I’ve done.  I’m considering putting it on some products on Zazzle – which means that I need to figure out how to make my store public in the best way.  I’m thinking of loading it onto the ScribblerWorks site as part of the Gallery.  I’ll be deciding that this week.

Posted in Events, Scribbler's Guide | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Website Updates – Jan. 3, 2011

I just did some revising of the site for The Scribbler’s Guide to the Land of Myth.  I’ve put most of the material on that site into the Word Press blog template, and given the whole a new banner heading.  Now there is a page for the annotated Table of Contents for the book, as well as the Introduction, right there at hand for everyone to read.

More revising for the ScribblerWorks site is also in the works, to make it cleaner and better.  And I’m planning to be adding more material to the site soon.

I’ve also set up a Zazzle account (under “Scribblerworks” of course), but am not ready to “go live” with that yet, as I’m still trying to figure out some issues regarding image size for things like t-shirts.  But soon, I will have it up and running.  2011 should be an interesting year.  At least, I’m hoping so.

Posted in Website Updates | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

New Desk Toy

A discussion online with some friends about favorite movie monsters recently revived my interest in the Creature from the Black Lagoon.  I’d always liked old Gillface, what with the underwater swimming and the Creature’s fascination with the human young woman in the expedition that first finds him (everyone assumes it’s a him of course, because of that fascination).  Being a writer, my brain started wondering how one would go about updating the story to fit our current modern world and sciences.  The Creature would have to be smarter, that’s for sure (not that he was a dumb cookie to start with).

I did a little online researching on the Creature, wondering what was out there in commentary on him — or the story property.  And I ran across an artist’s site, a guy who does sculpting for specialty action figures.  He was doing a sculpture of the Creature – and the girl – for a commerical figure, and had posted pictures of the work in progress on it.  Very interesting.  But there was no indication of when this figure would be available.

At the end of October, I went to the Long Beach Comic Con.  Because the convention is still on the smaller side, it makes it much easier to cruise the vendors selling action figures.  Plus, they usually have some pretty good prices on things.  And there it was.  That Creature figure.

So of course, I had to get it.  Even though I don’t really have much space for it at the moment. (I really need to rearrange all my knick-knacks!)

Here’s the whole set up —

The Creature from the Black Lagoon

The Creature from the Black Lagoon

 

The work on the figures is very good.

Detail of the Creature from the Black Lagoon

 

So, for the time being, this handsome fellow has taken a prominent position on the shelf over my desk.  I’m not sure he’ll stay there, since my Desk Guardians (as seen in this post) seem to resent his presence in their space.  But at least I have him.

Posted in Toys | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Loscon 2010

I’m going to be attending this year’s Loscon – and will be on four of the panels in the writing track (moderating two of them). I’ll also be in the dealers room a lot, at the GLAWS booth, selling and signing copies of The Scribbler’s Guide to the Land of Myth.

Here’s my schedule of appearances at Loscon (which is at the LAX Marriott Hotel, November 26-28).

Friday – 12:00 p.m. – New Orleans

Things That I Wish A Pro Had Told Me When I Started

Many aspiring writers waste time and brain cells when they first enter the world of writing professionally. Learn from industry pros many of the things you can avoid to save years of frustration and yes, brain cells, too.

Sarah Beach (m) —  Kathy Porter,  Buzz Dixon, PJ Hultstrand, Donald Jacques

[I need to dig out some of my early rejection letters to use as a springboard for discussion. This should be an interesting panel!]

Saturday 2:30 p.m. – New Orleans

Make It Or Break It (Your First Three Pages And Your First 50)

You hear from editors and agents that if the first paragraph you write isn’t strong enough, they won’t read the first page, let alone the first fifty. Separate fact from fiction and remain true to your story.

Tony N. Todaro (m) — Tim Powers, Sarah Beach, Denise Dumars, Sherwood Smith

Saturday 4:00 p.m. – New Orleans

A jury of peers – When to join a critique group.

Congrats! You’ve finished your story. Ready to have someone else read it? How about joining a Critique Group? Learn the benefits and pitfalls from those who have been through it all.

Ace Hall (m) — Stephen Blackmoore, Sarah Beach, James C. Glass, Laurie Tom

Sunday 10:00 – New Orleans

There goes 15% – why and when do you need an agent?

There’s a time and a place for everything, and at some point every novelist needs a good agent. But what do they really do for you? Can’t you save that commission and do it yourself?

Sarah Beach (m) — Tim Powers, Mel Gilden, Kathy Porter, James C. Glass

If you read science fiction and fantasy and want to talk about those works, Loscon is the place for you. The weekend after Thanksgiving is the time.

Posted in Conventions, Events, Scribbler's Guide, Writing | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Nights at the Theatre

If I’d had my act together, I would have seen the two first shows of the 19th season from the Actors Co-op on their opening nights.  And then posted reviews of them on the Reviews blog.  I mean to do that in the future, adding a new category for theatre reviews.  But in the meantime, I’ll make some observations here.

I’ve supported the Actors Co-op for most of its history, and always been impressed with their consistences.  From time to time, I may have questioned their choice of certain weak shows, but they’ve always delivered solid productions and performances.  This year is no exception.

Merrily We Roll Along posterThe opening show for the season was Sondheim’s Merrily We Roll Along.  It’s a challenging show for the audience, since the story is unfolded backwards from a disasterous scene where we see the final breaking of a long-standing friendship because of the utter commercialization of one of the main trio of characters, a song composer turned producer. Each following scene moves back in time, slowly revealing how he had been diverted from his original creative ideals.  The final scene, where the three friends first meet and inspire each other is heartbreaking because we now know how and why it will fail.  If only they had chosen differently!  The company did a pretty good job of handling this complex storytelling.

Marrily We Roll AlongFor me personally, the show pushed some buttons, because one of my “pending” (that is, unfinished) writing projects has a similar theme: how creative individuals can go astray, lose their original inspiration.  One difference though between this show and my play (titled The Wrecks of Glory) is that I believe that original inspiration can be regained and that loss and diminishment is not necessarily inevitable.  I’m not sure that is what is intended in Merrily, but it could easily be taken that way.  In any case, the show nudged me about my own project, and has stirred the pot on that bit of writing.

God's Favorite posterThe second show is the Neil Simon comedy God’s Favorite.  The simplest way of describing it would be the Book of Job presented as a modern sitcom.  But it doesn’t take the core issue as ridiculous: that a man’s choice to stay committed to God in the face of all disasters is not easy nor ignoble.  This production is very effective in presenting the emotional challenge of holding on – and Steve Gustafson as Simon’s Job, Joe Benjamin, does a fine job in conveying both the humor and pathos of his character.  And it spoke to Real World matters for me: not just the challenges I am facing myself, but also the challenges that many of my friends – unemployed in this harsh economy – are dealing with.  If you have to get messages from God, getting it in a satisfying piece of entertainment is a good thing.

 

Cast of God's Favorite

Coming soon from the Co-op will be their short-run Christmas show, Doris Baizley’s adaptation of Dickens’ A Christmas Carol.  Then after the new year, the company will be presenting Shakespeare’s King Lear, with Horton Foote’s The Traveling Lady to close out the season.

I recommend you Check Out the Company.

Posted in Events | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Long Beach Comic Con 2010 – Sunday

Ooops, so I’m a little late in getting the rest of the con report done.  Pardon me.  But here it is at last.

I got rolling in good time Sunday morning and had an easy drive down from Hollywood to the Long Beach Convention Center.  I got a good parking spot at the Convention Center.  When I got up to the entrance level, there wre some custom cars parked on the Promenade.  The one that caught my attention was someone’s Back to the Future DeLorean.

Back to the Future DeLoreonSo I snapped the pictures of the DeLorean, and then turned to head into the lobby.

Back to the Future DeLoreon

And the first person I saw was Dan DiDio, recently elevated to Co-Publisher for DC Comics.  I did not expect to see him there!  So, of course, that was the first thing I said to him as we shook hands in greeting.  He said he was out to the West Coast for some meetings starting Monday, and so decided to come out a day early and check out the con.  After that friendly encounter, we headed in.

 

 

Attendence was a bit lighter on Sonday, sort of expected.  But it was very amiable.  During the day, I chatted with friends in Artists Alley and they were a bit disappointed by the lower attendence and thus lower sales, but they felt the con was pleasant and well-run.  Except for the noise from the wrestling ring in the far back corner which made conversation difficult for the artists at that end of Artists Alley.

Another slight problem was that late additions to the program were not well publicized.  It had been a problem on Saturday regarding the Chaykin interview.  On Sunday, a DC Comics Town Hall was added to the schedule.  On the room activity listing outside the meting room.  I don’t know if it was announced in the Exhibit Hall.

Anyway, at noon the DC Comics Town Hall began, with Jimmy Palmiotti and Dan DiDio coming in to “run” it.  No sooner had Dan appeared at Registration (just after I’d parted from him) than they popped him into the schedule.

 

 

The gathering wasn’t large because not many knew of it.  It made the conversation cozier and very informal.  Dan and Jimmy began by talking about their longstanding friendship – and how they came to be writing Superboy just before Dan was first hired by DC Comics for the head editorial position.  The conversation roamed over topics, including a discussion on the importance of cover art in selling readers on a particular issue.

After that “panel” wound down, I moved on to a presentation by Dawn & Clint Wolf about starting out as an imdependant comic book creator and publisher.  They didn’t speak to anything new to me, but it was well organized for new creators.  And they had a goodly sized audience of attentive aspiring creators.

Over all, a very pleasant convention, well-run and relaxed.  The attendance wasn’t huge, but it is only their second year.  It was very friendly toward aspiring creators, and I think that is a factor they should continue to encourage.  I was pleased that in many of the panels I attended, the questions asked were well thought and good.  They were starting at a couple of steps above the questions that get asked at similar creator panels at the San Diego convention.  These attendees, aspiring to get into the comics business, were serious and prepared.  From the artists I watch taking advantage of Barbara Randall Kesel’s portfolio review to the aspiring comic book writers at the Wolf’s presentation, they were working at grounding themselves on the basics.

I liked the con and enjoyed myself.  I’m looking forward to the next one.

Posted in Comics, Conventions | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

About Research – Who Knows What?

(Originally posted on LiveJournal)

I started reading a new fantasy this week and within a couple of pages found myself being irritated. Please don’t take what follows as a review of the whole, because it is not. I mean to push on through before writing anything like that. No, this is just about one point I got snagged on.

1940s metal detectorIn these early pages, the main character assembles a metal detector and tries it out at a special location. The story is set in 1940, when such contraptions were apparently still new.

The problem is that the author describes the assembly of the object as if it were new to the reader. So the term “metal detector” is not used at all. Unfortunately, it makes the paragraph about the assembly boring. (Additionally, I don’t think the description itself fits what a 1940s version would look like – but I’d have to research that, and I haven’t done so yet.)

All of a sudden, I was going, “Look, we (the readers) know what a metal detector is! Don’t keep it a mystery with the generic description of the parts (such as “black box” for “battery”). Show us that it is strange to the character. Make us feel his uncertainty about whether it will work.”

It got me thinking about how “strange objects” are presented, particularly in fantasy. What is the best way to go about doing it?

My feeling is that if the object is known to the characters, I don’t explain it much to the reader. Rather, I just show it in use. Over 15 years ago, in a science fiction script, I had a character doing some work on her home computer, which had an interactive tablet surface built into her desk. This was extrapolated from things already available (my Palm PDA had a recognition program for hand written notes), so it wasn’t all that extreme. But a friend who was into computer hardware design at the time was impressed by what I’d envisioned. Yet, now, tablets for computers do exactly what I’d extrapolated. I’ve been drooling over the Cintiq, where the screen is even pressure sensitive, which makes it a wonderful tool for artists.

Okay, moving away from my raptures over the Cintiq ….

The point is that when is the “myserious object” approach workable, and when isn’t it? What do we want out of that moment? As far as I can tell, in the story I’m reading, although the metal detector is new to the characters, there’s nothing too extraordinary about it. So for me, I’d be more interested in getting a feeling of its newness to the characters, their uncertainty about it. The only time I’d want a “mysterious object” description for a known-to-the-reader object would be when the revelation of what it is makes for a turn in the story.

Am I off my rocker with this? Am I setting too high a standard in my expectations?

Posted in Musings | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

My Christmas Ritual

(Originally posted on LiveJournal)

I was watching my usual morning television (Good Morning, America) and caught a “Christmas preparation” commercial that nearly broke my heart.

Okay, that may be an exaggeration, but it did make me very sad. I don’t recall what the name of the service/store it was that was being advertised but… Here’s the “story” of the commercial — Mom is at the family laptop, with Spouse, Son and Daughter hovering behind her. Mom is putting up options of pictures that are to go on the family Christmas card. Of course, each member of the family wants one that has them front and center. While the family argues, Mom crops the pictures, drops the images of each family member into a template, clicks a button, and closes the laptop. A superscript informs the viewer that this service not only prints out the cards the way you want them, it addresses and mails them.

What struck me – negatively – is that not only did that family not see the final card, not one of the family ever touched the cards. I’m assuming the program pulls addresses from your address book database.

But it’s all automated. Not a touch. No personalized notes. No attention to the people who are receiving the cards.

At this point I thought, “If you’re going to treat sending Christmas cards as something to be done with no more emotion than paying bills, why do it at all?”

Angle angelI have a really long Christmas card list. Because I like sending cards to the people in my life. Because my list is so long, I stopped buying commercially made cards long ago. Besides, I was having a hard time finding cards that really spoke to what Christmas means to me — the birth of my savior, Jesus Christ. So, being an artist, I started doing my own.

I design my own cards. I draw a new design each year, something fairly simple that will be printed in a single color. I take the design to a printer, select a specific card stock, and have the print run made. While the printing company makes the cards, I take the envelopes home and start hand addressing the envelopes.

Going through the address book, handwriting the addresses — this activity lets me think about the individual recipients. So, when I pick up the finished cards and start adding the personal notes inside, I’ve already put a little thought into how I am connected to the recipient, things that happened this last year that might be of interest to them. Or just including my holiday greeting because the recipient is someone with whom I have frequent contact.

Madonna and childI don’t expect quid pro quo on the sending of cards. I realize many people do not have the card-sending habit. I also used to be concerned about sending “religious” Christmas cards to my friends who either belonged to another faith or were non-believers. But when I decided to make my own cards, I gave this a lot of thought. I used to go find generic holiday cards to send to those folks. But it was an added expense. And I came to the conclusion that the sending of the cards was not about the recipients’ beliefs, it was about mine. This card-sending ritual was about why Christmas is important to me. It is my acknowledgement of all the people who have touched my life. It is about who I am. These people all know I am a Christian, and they accept that. So why should I imagine that they would be bothered by my Christmas cards?

If anyone is, they’ve never said so to me. Instead, I find that people appreciate the personal acknowledgement. People like the unique nature of my cards. They appreciate the personalized notes written in them. I think they even take in the significance of the hand addressed envelopes. I took time and thought about them specifically, if even only for a few minutes. I did not print off mailing labels, stick them on envelopes, and stick cards with preprinted signatures on them into the envelopes.

Of course, understand that I do not mind receiving cards like that from my friends. I well know that in busy families those can be time-saving steps. And like I said, Christmas cards are not about quid pro quo for me. What I have described is my ritual and what it means to me.

That commercial this morning just brought it all to mind. I have to do this year’s design and get it to the printer soon. I have to collect new addresses from friends who have moved. I have to find addresses for new friends I’ve made. And then I have to calculate how much postage I’ll have to get.

It’s a lot of labor for me, but I love it. I love contacting people at least once a year and letting them know they are thought of. It is a little bit of a family tradition. My father had a longish Christmas card list. He wrote short notes on his cards (which he often made by silk screen). I once glanced at his Christmas card “Rolodex” (index cards with a hole punched in a corner, on a large ring – with hand updated addresses). There were many people on his ring that I did not know. But I realized many of them were people from his past. I absorbed this practice as a good idea.

My ideal is to at least begin sending out my Christmas cards at the start of Advent, the time of preparation before Christmas. To do that requires beginning, well … about now. Because I never want to reach the point of having the kind of attitude toward sending Christmas cards like that shown in this morning’s commercial.

Comments

sartorias – Nov. 15th, 2010

I had to stop sending Christmas cards when the list got so impossibly long due to all the steps, halves, divorces, new kids, new relationships, then bio relationships (and people would be hurt if someone got one and someone else didn’t) but I do like getting personalized ones and keep them up until after Epiphany.)

scribblerworks – Nov. 16th, 2010

Oh, I can well understand those constraints. I’m certainly blessed that my own family doesn’t have those kinds of ruptures. But it is difficult when couples I know split and I feel connected to both parties as individuals.

What I’m also finding funny now is that children of friends are reaching adulthood, and I have to figure out how to handle that. Someone like Emily Rauscher has earned her own place on my list, but there are other youngsters who have reached college age, and I go “Hmm. Include them in a family card or send them their own?”

dewline – Nov. 15th, 2010

Understood.

At some point, I’ll have to post my own thinking on this one. Whether it makes sense once that’s done…not sure yet.

scribblerworks – Nov. 16th, 2010

I think sending the cards is a very personal choice, obviously. So if it makes sense to you, that’s what works.

banzailibrarian – Nov. 15th, 2010

Sarah, you do make the most beautiful cards, and I do appreciate them even though I don’t share your faith, because they do tell me something about you.

One of the ways I knew my marriage was coming to an end was, sadly, when my now ex-husband stopped participating in the Christmas card ritual, when we would sit around the dining table and drink cocoa and form an assembly line to fold letters and sign, seal, and stamp the cards. The year I first had to do it all myself was very sad. Now that my list is much smaller, I should take the opportunity to start making handmade cards…and being divorced, keeping up those connections now is even more important to me.

scribblerworks – Nov. 16th, 2010

Thanks for the compliments on the cards. As an artist, there’s always that sense of “Well, this pleases me, but will it touch others?” behind some designs. And sometimes, all the plans get thrown out the window in favor of something spontaneous. A couple of years ago, the geometric three kings was one of those. I’d meant to do something else entirely, but when I sat down to do the design it just wasn’t working. So I stepped back and said, “Well, what am I feeling here?” The whimsical approach to the kings popped up and I went with it.

And too, as you said, they do say something about me – which was sort of the point behind my choosing to make my own cards. “This is me, saying this about a holiday that is important to me.” I like that aspect of the activity – and am pleased that it comes through!

I think there is something powerful in the end-of-the-year season, that makes it a good time for this once-a-year type of contact with friends. I can see that beyond all the religious connotations for myself. Here in the northern hemisphere, it’s the darkest time of the year – so why not acknowledge those who are figuratively lights in one’s life? And those year’s-end wrap up letters from friends are always nice to read.

LOL! I’m working myself up to the Christmas spirit, and it’s not even Thanksgiving yet! If I’m not careful I’m going to start bursting out with chirps like Tiny Tim! “God bless us every one!”

Oh, why not? Bless you all! 😀

wellinghall – Nov. 17th, 2010

Do you know this?
http://www.readbookonline.net/readOnLine/395/

scribblerworks – Nov. 18th, 2010

No, I hadn’t read that before. Ha.

😀

But yeah, those perfunctory “obligation” gifts do rather undercut the nature of gift giving for Christmas.

Posted in Personal | Leave a comment

Tolkien Snobbery

(Originally posted on LiveJournal)

I was roaming around a social website this last week, one that services writers, and was looking at one writer’s profile. Under the heading “Favorite Books” she began with “Tolkien’s Trilogy” — and then the rest were book titles without reference to author, at least not that way. I looked at that and snorted. Yea, verily, even in the confines of mine own castle, I snorted.

Boxed set of the Ballantine edition of the Lord of the Rings

Boxed set of an early printing of the Ballantine edition of The Lord of the Rings

Then I immediately thought, in a flash of astonishment, “I am a Tolkien snob!” Because, of course, what flew behind the snort was “It’s not a trilogy! It’s one novel in three volumes!” And then “She can’t cite the title?”; followed by “Does she list it first because Tolkien is cool now?”

Those were all truly snobbish and cutting thoughts. Tsk. But there’s just something about being into a subject ahead of the wave of popular culture that affects one’s attitude. There’s a new watershed point for Tolkien readers now that will cause ripples for a time, pre-moive and post-movie readers. By that I mean there will be one set of readers who discovered The Lord of the Rings before Peter Jackson’s films were made, and then another set of readers who came to the work because they saw the films. (The Bakshi and Rankin & Bass works had nowhere near the same impact as Jackson’s.)

I suppose this mental snobbery is bound to appear when one sits on the border of Art and Popular Culture. I certainly reside on that border — a scholar of literature, raised on Classical music and art museums, yet also one interested in pop culture as both audience member and creator of same. But certain artistic works sit there as well: the “Mona Lisa,” for instance. The work’s “life” in pop culture in no way detracts from its existence in the realm of Art.

Okay, what is happening here is that I’m trying to talk myself out of snobbery. I guess it probably won’t be successful. I think the scholar side of my personality will remain a bit snobbish, while the Pop Culturist won’t be. Hopefully, the two parts will live on in harmony.

Comments

kalimac – Nov. 2nd, 2010

Don’t. “Snobbery” in such cases is only the word for knowledge and real appreciation used by people who have neither.

scribblerworks – Nov. 2nd, 2010

Well, I was using it rather tongue-in-cheek here, simply because I was amused by my immediate snorting. But objectively, yes, I agree: in more normal circumstances I’d probably call myself more of a “purist.”

kalimac – Nov. 2nd, 2010

I dislike the term “purist” for myself because I’m not a purist – I laughed at Bored of the Rings, for instance, which the real purists I know look down on with the same withering disdain they reserve for Rankin-Bass – and because, to fans of the Jackson movies, “purist” means “someone who would only be happy with a movie that’s 70 hours long with Bombadil in it,” which is not what I wanted and would not address my problems with Jackson at all.

kalimac – Nov. 2nd, 2010

Oh, and sometimes I refer to “Tolkien’s trilogy” just to startle people, and to their confused looks I reply, “The Hobbit, The Lord of the Rings, and The Silmarillion, of course.”

scribblerworks – Nov. 2nd, 2010

That also occurred to me, but it seemed more sophisticated than this particular writer’s list indicated. 😀

kalimac – Nov. 2nd, 2010

I only use lines like that with people who will get it.

sartorias – Nov. 2nd, 2010

I’ve heard some people refer to Tolkien’s trilogy because so many people think, when one says LORD OF THE RINGS, that the movie is meant.

scribblerworks – Nov. 2nd, 2010

Oh, dear! I don’t think I’ve run across that yet. Well, forewarned….

kalimac – Nov. 2nd, 2010

Worse yet are the people who think “Tolkien’s trilogy” is the movies.

margdean56 – Nov. 2nd, 2010

I prefer to say “purist” rather than “snob”. As in, “I’m too much of a purist to enjoy the movies.”

scribblerworks – Nov. 2nd, 2010

Yeah. I’d be inclined to do that usually too.

But I’ve discovered that even as a “purist”, I can be flexible. I have called myself something of a Sherlock purist (Jeremy Brett is the quintessential Sherlock!), but I actually liked the recent feature film and then the new BBC 21st century version. Does that enjoyment revoke my Sherlock Purist card? I’ve heard other purists speak very disapprovingly of Downey’s Sherlock.

kalimac – Nov. 2nd, 2010

I liked Downey’s acting, but then I usually do. The film was otherwise boring and negligible, though not as much so as his Iron Man, which was pretty grim.

The 21st century version I’m finding delightful, but partly because it is 21st century, I’m not parsing it as Sherlock Holmes at all, but a riff inspired by Holmes. The fact that nobody calls him “Holmes” but only by his first name – which they’d never do in the original, except perhaps for Mycroft – helps distinguish them.

corrinalaw – Nov. 3rd, 2010

I thought the movie with RDJ was entertaining. He’s not really playing Holmes, of course, but once you get past that, it’s not bad.

I am loving the 21st century version. One, because it’s what you said, a great riff inspired by the original stories and, two, the creator REALLY knows his Holmes stuff. I think I caught an easter egg not just from the stories in the first episode but in *notes* from the W. S. Baring-Gould two-volume set–particularly about Watson’s wandering wound. (And this Watson is our new Bilbo which is, I think, perfect.)

As for LotR, well, I don’t see it as snobbery, more passion for wanting accuracy about a favorite thing. I’m not a Tolkien purist in the least but I did twitch once or twice with the second & third movies. (Didn’t like the reworking of Helm’s Deep or Faramir being rewritten.)

kalimac – Nov. 3rd, 2010

That’s probably it: these creators know and love Holmes. Peter Jackson knows little of Tolkien and cares less, he just thinks he does.

Posted in Musings | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment